Topic : | UW/Panda IMAP [dt]mail buffer overflow
|
SecurityAlert : 4570
CVE : CVE-2008-5005
CWE : CWE-119
SecurityRisk : High (About)
Remote Exploit : Yes
Local Exploit : No
Victim interaction required : No
Exploit Available : No
Credit : Bitsec Labs
Published : 11.11.2008
Affected Software : | university_of_washington:imap_toolkit:2002
university_of_washington:imap_toolkit:2003
university_of_washington:imap_toolkit:2004
university_of_washington:imap_toolkit:2005
university_of_washington:imap_toolkit:2006
university_of_washington:imap_toolkit:2007
university_of_washington:imap_toolkit:2007c
university_of_washington:alpine:2.00
university_of_washington:alpine:1.10
university_of_washington:alpine:1.00
university_of_washington:alpine:0.999999
university_of_washington:alpine:0.99999
university_of_washington:alpine:0.9999
university_of_washington:alpine:0.999
university_of_washington:alpine:0.99
university_of_washington:alpine:0.98
university_of_washington:alpine:0.83
university_of_washington:alpine:0.82
university_of_washington:alpine:0.81
university_of_washington:alpine:0.80 |
 Advisory Content : -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
========================================================================
=======
Bitsec Security Advisory: UW/Panda IMAP [dt]mail buffer overflow
2008-11-03
========================================================================
=======
Applications tmail/dmail in UW IMAP [2002-2007c], Panda IMAP, Alpine <=
2.00
Discovered by Aron Andersson <aron.andersson (at) bitsec (dot) com [email
concealed]>,
Jan Sahlin <jan.sahlin (at) bitsec (dot) com [email
concealed]>
Researched by Aron Andersson <aron.andersson (at) bitsec (dot) com [email
concealed]>
Reference http://www.bitsec.com/en/rad/bsa-081103.txt
GPG Key http://www.bitsec.com/labs.asc
Overview
tmail and dmail are mail delivery agents that deliver mail to a user's
INBOX
or a designated folder, specified by the folder extension in the
user+folder
argument on the command line. If tmail is used for mail delivery from a
process whose UID is not the destination user, it must be installed
setuid
root; dmail can be used when the process is run as the destination user.
Problem
A vulnerability exists in both applications due to missing boundary checks
on
the folder extension argument from the command line. The bug can be
exploited
by overflowing a stack buffer via an overly long folder name.
For tmail, this could allow for arbitrary code execution as the root user.
As
mentioned the vulnerability also exists for dmail, but the impact is a
bit
less critical since it usually runs as the recipient user and not root.
Depending on the mailer daemon and configuration in use, this bug may also
be remotely exploitable.
The bug is caused by the following pieces of code:
[tmail.c]
char *getusername (char *s,char **t)
{
char tmp[MAILTMPLEN];
if (*t = strchr (s,'+')) { /* have a mailbox specifier? */
*(*t)++ = '\0'; /* yes, tie off user name */
/* user+ and user+INBOX same as user
*/
if (!**t || !strcmp ("INBOX",ucase (strcpy (tmp,*t)))) *t = NIL;
}
return s; /* return user name */
}
[dmail.c]
int deliver (FILE *f,unsigned long msglen,char *user)
{
MAILSTREAM *ds = NIL;
char *s,*mailbox,tmp[MAILTMPLEN],path[MAILTMPLEN];
STRING st;
struct stat sbuf;
/* have a mailbox specifier? */
if (mailbox = strchr (user,'+')) {
*mailbox++ = '\0'; /* yes, tie off user name */
if (!*mailbox || !strcmp ("INBOX",ucase (strcpy (tmp,mailbox))))
mailbox = NIL; /* user+ and user+INBOX same as user
*/
}
(..)
The user+folder command line argument reaches deliver() and getusername()
through the char pointers 's' and 'user', respectively. The folder part
is
separated from the user and copied to the buffer 'tmp'. Since 'tmp' is
placed
on the stack, an overly long folder name can be used to overwrite stack
data,
including but not limited to the saved EIP.
Exploit
A proof-of-concept exploit for this vulnerability has been developed but
will
not be publicly released until 2008-11-10, by which time it can be found
at
http://www.bitsec.com/en/rad/bsa-081103.c
Fix
Upgrade to the latest version from your IMAP vendor:
- UW IMAP: 2007d
http://www.washington.edu/imap/
- Panda IMAP: tmail ver 2008.24, dmail ver 2008.19
http://www.panda.com/imap/
- Alpine: No fix, tmail/dmail users should get UW IMAP 2007d
http://www.washington.edu/alpine/
Disclosure Timeline
2008-10-24 Notified developers (Mark Crispin, Steve Hubert)
2008-10-27 Received response from developers
2008-10-27 Panda IMAP patched
2008-10-30 UW IMAP patched
2008-11-03 Public release
========================================================================
=======
Bitsec Security Advisory: UW/Panda IMAP [dt]mail buffer overflow
2008-11-03
========================================================================
=======
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFJDuPnzx20c5GX95oRApDFAKCLzTOOPmHsoGCcgxkbZvtCSFQujgCgugO/
yjilZ4XHBYXTPEXbVVnS7Rk=
=OsgS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
References :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469667
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-uw/2008-October/002267.html
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/498002/100/0/threaded
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/03/5
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/03/4
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/03/3
http://www.bitsec.com/en/rad/bsa-081103.txt
http://securitytracker.com/id?1021131
http://secunia.com/advisories/32483
http://panda.com/imap/
http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure&m=122572590212610&w=4
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-uw/2008-October/002268.html
Feedback :
If you have additional information or notice any errors regarding this security advisory, please use contact form or email us at info()securityreason()com.
|